Gebruikershulpmiddelen

Site-hulpmiddelen


campanula:angustiflora

Verschillen

Dit geeft de verschillen weer tussen de geselecteerde revisie en de huidige revisie van de pagina.

Link naar deze vergelijking

campanula:angustiflora [2018/05/03 10:22] (huidige)
Regel 1: Regel 1:
 +===== angustiflora =====
 +{clear}
 +
 +
 +===== Campanula angustiflora =====
 +{clear}
 +===== Twitter =====
 +For regular additions, follow via Twitter **@Klokjesbloem** {https://​twitter.com/​@Klokjesbloem}[{{:​twitter.png?​50|}}]
 +{clear}
 + 
 +
 +
 +===== Taxonomic History =====
 +**W.H. Brewer** (1867) made the earliest known collection of this group in 1862 on Mt. Hamilton (Santa Clara Co.) just a few days after he had found its striking associate, //Clarkia breweri// (A. Gray) Greene. Gray never assigned a species name to the specimen, and this //​campanula//​ was not collected again until Rattan found it on Mt. Diablo (Contra Costa Co.) and described it as //Campanula exigua// (Rattan, 1886). ​ In his description,​ Rattan referred to a plant taken that same year by Mrs. Curran on Mt. Tamalpais (Marin Co.). **Alice Eastwood** (1898) included the Mt. Tamalpais plant in //Campanula angustiflora//​ Eastwood. In her discussion of the new species, Eastwood referred to "very young specimens of an annual //​Campanula//"​ collected in Priest Valley (Monterey Co.) that shared some characteristics with both named taxa, but that she chose to retain in //Campanula angustiflora//​. Howell (1938) eventually described this plant as //Campanula angustiflora//​ var. **exilis**, herein named //Campanula griffinii//​.(( :​ref:​nancymorin01 ))
 +{clear}
 +Eastwood, Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 3rd Ser. 1:132-133. 1898. - Type: California, Marin Co., Mt. Tamalpais, 5 Jul 1886, //M. K. Curran s.n.// (Holotype CAS!). Para-types: same locality as holotype: June 1890 and July 1898, //Mrs. Brandegee s.n.//, ND! US!; //Eastwood s.n.// (CAS but lost in 1906?); 14 Jul 1894 (?) //Congdon s.n.// GH!; Sonoma, Mt. St. Helena, //Mrs. Brandegee s.n.// CAS!
 +{clear}
 +
 +All of the California annuals (//​Campanula angustiflora//,​ //Campanula exigua//, //Campanula sharsmithiae//​ and //Campanula griffinii//​) have been a source of confusion since their discovery, judging from the misidentifications found in herbaria, and they are not known to be closely related to any other //​campanulas//​. Treatment of small-flowered and annual Old World //​campanulas//​ has been controversial (Boissier, 1874; de Candolle, 1830; Gadella, 1964, 1966; Federov, 1957), and knowledge of New World //​campanulas//​ is very limited (Shetler, 1963). Here I give detailed descriptions of the Californian annual //​campanulas // in order to facilitate eventual comparison between them and their Nort American relatives and between them and their Mediterranean counterparts.(( :​ref:​nancymorin01 ))
 +{clear}
 +
 +===== Habitus =====
 +Erect annual, 5-25cm high; stems 4-angled, hispid.
 +{clear}
 +Morphological simularities of these taxa to other Nort American //​Campanulideae//​ may be due to convergence;​ consequently,​ the relationships of these four species (//​Campanula angustifloar//,​ //Campanula exigua//, //Campanula sharsmithiae//​ and //Campanula griffinii//​) are obscure.
 +{clear}
 +
 +//Campanula angustiflora//​ can be distinguished from other small-flowered //​campanulas//​ by its sessile, oblong-ovate,​ coarsely serrate leaves. It is vegetatively similar to //​Heterocodon//​ and //​Triodanis//,​ both of which have at least some cleisogamous flowers. Many of the lower cauline leaves of //Campanula angustiflora//​ subtend very short flowering stems, and this strengthens the resemblanche tot //​Triodanis//,​ the leaves of which subtend seemingly axillary but actually terminal, sessile, flowers (McVaugh, 1945). The possible relationship of these three taxa trough some very early ancestor should be kept in mind. (( :​ref:​nancymorin01 ))
 +{clear}
 +===== Flowers =====
 +Apr - Jul; Small flowers, bracts 1.5-3.5 times as long as broad, 3.5-5.5mm long, oblong-ovate to lanceolate, few toothed, evenly distributed on branch.
 +{clear}
 +Flowers terminal, pedicel (3-)10(-20)mm ​ long; corollas pale blue to white, all parts equally UV-absorbing,​ 2.5-5mm long, cylindrical,​ with five acute, spreading lobes 1.1-1.7mm long, no inner papillae; style white, 2.1-3.0mm long, papillate distally half its length; style lobes 0.15 to 0.3 times the length of the style, loosely appressed at anthesis; stamens 2.0-2.6mm long, anthers as long as filaments, filaments gradually broadened to base, with few cilia; pollen 0.03mm dia., 6-porate, the pores equatorial; ovary 2-3mm long, obovoid, broadest at middle and narrowed apically, finely ribbed; calyx lobes slightly unequal, 2-6mm long, erect, subulate; calyx lobes connivent in fruit forming a kind of break.
 +{clear}
 +
 +Equatoriallyporate pollen
 +{clear}
 +Flowers of //Campanula angustiflora//​ depart from the pattern typical for //​Campanula//​ as described by Shetler (1979): the corollas are small, cylindrical,​ and inconspicuous;​ the filaments are not dilated; the style is incompletely papillate. However, the corolla is usually exserted from the calyx lobes and the filaments are ciliate. Because the style lobes are not completely appressed to each other during style elongation, pollen is deposited on and trapped in the stigmatic area before anthesis. Cross-pollination is not necessarily excluded, but, considering the reduction in characters usually associated with allogamy and the presence of self-compatibility,​ it seems likely that autogamy is the primary breeding system in this species. In her description of Campanula angustiflora,​ Eastwood (1898) stated that the sides of the style were entirely smooth and illustrated in that way in an accompanying figure. The pictured style has fully recurved lobes: at that point in development the stylar papillae would all be invaginated (Shetler, 1979).(( :​ref:​nancymorin01 ))
 +{clear}
 +===== Chromosomes =====
 +n = 15;
 +{clear}
 +//Campanula angustiflora//​ and //Campanula griffinii// are predominantly autogamous, an unusual character stat for the genus. These are the first annual campanulas reported to have chromosome numbers n = 15 or n = 17.(( :​ref:​nancymorin01 ))
 +{clear}
 +
 +===== Leaves =====
 +Cauline leaves sessile, alternate, 4,5-9mm long, oblong-ovate,​ acute, coarsely serrate, abaxial side hispid, longest leaf 3-4 nodes below first flower. Wide leaves.
 +{clear}
 +===== Fruit =====
 +Capsule spheroid, strongly ribbed, pore inter-rib area strongly infolded and tuberculate;​ pore about midway between base and apex of capsule; ovules 50-100, seeds light brown, 0.7mm long, twice as long as broad, fusuform, finely striate, 3-sided or keeled (Fig.1).
 +===== Varieties =====
 +
 +Campanula angustiflora var. **exilis**
 +{clear}
 +
 +Originally described as //Campanula angustiflora//​ var. **exilis**, but here recognized at the specific level //Campanula griffinii//​. ​ (( :​ref:​nancymorin01 ))
 +{clear}
 +===== Origin =====
 +{clear}
 +Locally abundant in serpentine soil, chaparral, or burned over areas in the Inner North Coast Ranges, central Lake Co., south to Martin Co., and central Santa Cruz Co., 30-660m (Fig. 4).
 +{clear}
 +[{{:​literatuur:​tn_nancy_morin_4.jpg?​200|Fig 4. Distribution of annual California campanulas.}}]
 +{clear}
 +
 +Four of the ten species of //​Campanula//​ that are found in the California Floristic Province are annuals; //Campanula angustiflora//​ - grows in the North Coast Ranges and in the Santa Cruz Mts. (( :​ref:​nancymorin01 ))
 +{clear}
 +
 +===== Methods =====
 +Seeds of field-collected plants were grown at the University of California Botanical Garden in pots of "UC Mix, formula C" soil (Matkin and Chandler, 1957), in insect exclosures, for studies of morphology, cytology, and pollination system. Seed sources are indicated in the Taxonomic Treatment and included at least one northers and one southern population of each species except Campanula sharsmithiae,​ seeds of which were not available. Voucher specimens are in UC.
 +
 +Buds from field-collected and garden-grown plants were preserved in Carnoy'​s 6:3:1 solution; microsporocytes were stained in acetocarmine for chromosome preparations. Pollen was mounted in lactophenol and cotton blue for study of general morphology and was prepared following the method of Lynch and Webster (1975) for study of exine ultrastructure,​ except that material was CO2-critical-point-dried directly from 100 percent ethanol. After initial preparation the pollen was coated with 30nm of gold palladium and viewed on a Coates and Welter Model 50 Emission Scanning Electron Microscope.
 +
 +Measurements of vegetative and floral parts were made on pressed, garden-grown plants and on herbarium specimens from BR, CAS, CU, DAV, DS, GH, JEPS, K, MICH, MO, ND, NO, NY, ORE, OSC, PH, POM, RSA, SBBG, UC, UCSB, US, UTC, WS, and WTU. Corollas of living plants were photographed in direct sunlight with a Tiffin 18A Photar filter with high speed Ektachrome and Tri-X films to document ultraviolet (UV) absorptions patterns.
 +
 +Flowers of carpellate parents in artificial crosses were emasculated before anthesis and later pollinated by transferring pollen from the style of the staminate parent, on sterile forceps, to the stigmatic surface of the carpellate parent. Except when they were being manipulated,​ the flowers were covered with Kimwipe bags before anthesis with no further treatment. Self-compatibility of //Campanula exigua// was tested by transferring pollen from the style to the stigma of the same flower. Pollen is deposited on the stigmatic area of //Campanula angustiflora//​ and //Campanula griffinii// before anthesis and therefore was not artificially transferred. Presence of apomixis was tested by leaving emasculated flowers unpollinated.
 +
 +===== Results of methods =====
 +The two most obvious characters that separate these annual species are leaf width and corolla size (Figs. 1 and 2). 
 +{clear}
 +
 +[{{:​literatuur:​tn_nancy_morin_1.jpg?​200|Fig.1. A. Campanula exigua Rattan (after Griffin 4141, UC). B. Campanula griffinii Morin (after Griffin 4120, UC). C. Campanula angustiflora Eastwood (after Morin 249, UC). Habits: scale bar=1 cm. Details )sty=style, sta=stamen, co=corolla, f=flower):​scale bar=1 mm.}}]
 +[{{:​literatuur:​tn_nancy_morin_2.jpg?​200|Fig.2. Campanula sharsmithiae Morin (After Morin 299, UC). Habit: scale bar=1 cm. Details (sty=style, sta=stamen, f=flower): scale bar=1 mm; (h=hair): scale bar=o.1 mm.}}]
 +{clear}
 +
 +//Campanula exigua// and //Campanula sharsmithiae//​ have large flowers. The former has thin, narrow leaves and the latter has fleshy, broader leaves. //Campanula griffinii// has narrow leaves and small flowers, and //Campanula angustiflora//​ has broad leaves and small flowers. These species also differ in ovary shape, filaments shape, and position of upper bracts. These characters, along with flower size and leaf shape, are more constant under garden conditions than most other characters. For this reason, they were chosen as major, differentiating characters.
 +
 +//Campanula exigua//, //Campanula sharsmithiae//​ and //Campanula griffinii// have //n// = 17, wheras //Campanula angustiflora//​ has //n// = 15; they are the first annual //​campanulas//​ reported to have these numbers. At least two populations of each species (only one for //Campanula sharsmithiae//​) were counted; vouchers are deposited in UC and indicated in the Taxonomic Treatment.
 +
 +//Campanula exigua// has 12-pantoporate pollen, //Campanula sharsmithiae//​ has 14-20 pantoporate pollen, and //Campanula griffinii// has 8-pantoporate pollen (Fig.3). Pantoporate pollen in //​Campanulaceae//​ has previously been known only from //Campanula americana// (Dunbar, 1975), //Campanula angustiflora//​ has 6-porate pollen, the pores equatorial (Fig.3). Following the terminology used by Dunbar (1975), pollen sexine fine structure for the species studied can be described as short ridges, tip end bent upwards, with basally divided spinules (Fig.3).
 +{clear}
 +
 +[{{:​literatuur:​tn_nancy_morin_3.jpg?​300|Fig.3. a, b. Campanula angustiflora. c, d. Campanula griffinii. e, f. Campanula exigua. a, c, e. Pollen grains, scale bars=5mu m. b, d, f. Detail of exine, scale bars=0.5 mu m.}}]
 +{clear}
 +
 +Reciprocal crosses among all species were unsuccessful. Unemasculated,​ bagged flowers and unbagged flowers of //Campanula angustiflora//​ and //Campanula griffinii// set seed (50-80 seeds per capsule), but emasculated,​ unpollinated flowers did not produce seed. These two species are self-pollinating and self-compatible;​ they do not appear to be apomictic, but pseudogamy cannot be ruled out. No flowers of //Campanula exigua// produced seed. Since even control, intrapopulational crosses were unsuccessful even though flowers in the field produce up to 100 seeds each, failure may have been due to technical problems such as mechanical damage to the stigma. //Campanula exigua// is not self-pollinating and seems to be self self-incompatible.
 +{clear}
  
campanula/angustiflora.txt · Laatst gewijzigd: 2018/05/03 10:22 (Externe bewerking)